The One Thing No One is Talking About

Have you noticed the rapid and sustained destruction of everything?

We live in a time when there is no trust in our institutions. Seriously, name one that isn't broken beyond repair. I'm waiting.

Still waiting.

We are told we are on the verge of World War 3. The mainstream media appears to be salivating over this.

In the USA we have a cabal of corrupt authoritarians making decisions behind the scenes, mouthpieced by the corrupt, senile old fart sitting in the presidency. 

It all leads to death. I'm not joking.

Why do I say that? Everything these days seems to serve one agenda above all others. What is the agenda? 

It isn't anything currently being discussed in any of the media outlets.  It is not racism, sexism, heteronormism, or any of the other isms we are supposed to care about on a daily basis. 

It's population reduction. 

The silence is odd, as only a decade ago people like this asshole advocated population reduction. It used to be that our national sophists were all in favor of the zero population growth movement and population reduction. Now there seems to be an eerie silence around this topic. 

Yet, every single sweeping legislation, and every single stage-managed "cultural shift" serves this agenda. Want proof? Here's a list, in no particular order:

• Same-Sex Marriage: No matter what those who insist we "trust the science" say, the union of two males, or two females, does not produce children. = Zero Population Growth Agenda
• Queer Hookup Culture: See above. = Zero Population Growth Agenda
• Cannabis Legalization: Cannabis leads to lower sperm counts in all animals tested. (Not enough testing has been performed on humans, conveniently.) = Zero Population Growth Agenda
• Transitioning: Those who change their sex are unable to produce children. To transition is to go through a voluntary sterilization. = Zero Population Agenda
• The Plague: A certain virus manufactured in a lab that then "escaped" has led to global illness, death, and madness. = Population Reduction Agenda
• The Cure for the Plague: Young, healthy people dying for "no reason." They call it "Sudden Death." Is there a correlation with the cure for the plague? Nothing to see here folks... keep your eyes down and keep moving. = Population Reduction Agenda
• The Political Response to the Plague: When that asshole Andrew Cuomo decreed that the plague-infected be put into nursing homes, my first thought was "Well, the Nazis went after the old and infirm first... makes sense." = Population Reduction Agenda
• WW3: The mainstream media keeps telling us we're on the verge of World War 3, and they keep warning us of Russia's nuclear threat.
  War in general is, next to plague, one of the most effective ways to reduce surplus population. It always has been. Modern warfare, with nukes, remotely operated drones, robotic weapons, and weaponized viruses, is designed to swiftly and efficiently reduce the populations of troublesome people. = Population Reduction Agenda

I could go on. I'm sure you can find many more things that have become normal in the last few years that lead to the population reduction agenda.

There are currently over 8 Billion people in the world. We have been told that an ideal world population would be between 2-3 Billion, the now demolished Georgia Guidestones recommended 500 Million. So, between roughly one-quarter (1/4) to one-eighth (1/8) of the current population is recommended by those in power as sustainable, and easier to control. That's an awful lot of population reduction. In fact, it's a huge reduction.

So, why are all those who have talked almost non-stop about the need for population reduction so silent? Listen... it's graveyard silent. 

Could it be that it is no longer necessary to urge population reduction when all of the machinery is currently working in place to make it so? Maybe those who pushed this hardest are quietest because they don't want to be publicly associated with the death they advocated? Maybe they want the benefits of a nice easily controlled and managed planet of 500 Million without being seen as the bad guys? 

Could it be that maybe they don't want the public to perceive them as the eugenicists that they so obviously are? 

Welcome to the new eugenics movement. 

I'll let you chew on that for a while.

Your Ol' Pal,

Devilhead